Donna Bibber shares insight about micro ophthalmic ocular implants and the continued impact of micro mold manufacturing on worldwide growth in the next five years.
Micro ophthalmic and intraocular implants continue to be one of the largest and fastest-growing global micro medical and pharma micro device market sectors. Driven by a baby boomer aging population, technology innovations, and vast, rapidly emerging markets in China and India, the ophthalmic devices sector is expected to attain a double-digit growth. Age-related eye diseases such as cataracts, diabetic retinopathy, glaucoma and macular degeneration (to name only a few) continue to cause significant or complete loss of vision. Since ophthalmic and intraocular implants are largely made up of many micro-sized and highly precise components and assemblies, it’s easy to understand the intense impact of micro molding manufacturing on this market.
The global ophthalmic device market was valued at $10 billion (£6 billion) in 2008 with the US market comprising $5.5 billion of this. Driven by growth in the vision care and cataract surgery market categories, the market is forecast to grow by 8.5% annually during 2008-2015 to reach $15 billion worldwide ($9.8 billion in the US).
On the downside, due to reduced consumer discretionary spending in the US, the market continues to grapple with growth decline in refractive surgery. On the upside, the treatments for other conditions are the major factors for the vastly emerging growth markets worldwide.
Major players in the ophthalmic pharmaceutical space include:
- Alcon (now part of Novartis)
- Allergan Inc
- Bausch & Lomb Inc
- Daiichi Pharmaceutical Co Ltd
- Genentech Inc
- Inspire Pharmaceuticals Inc
- ISTA Pharmaceuticals Inc
- Johnson & Johnson (Vistakon Pharmaceuticals LLC)
- Merck & Co Inc
- Pfizer Inc
- Santen Pharmaceutical Co Ltd.
“Successful creation of a device that is both paper thin and strong is an engineering challenge that requires the skill and expertise that only micro molding and nano surface specialty companies can understand and implement…”
Major players in the surgical ophthalmic space include:
- Abbott Medical Optics
- Bausch + Lomb Inc.
Eye Conditions and Treatment
The eye is a complex and sensitive organ. There are many structures and targets, located closely together and sometimes, in terms of targets for treatment, these structures are conflicting with one another in their proximity. Existing in the eye are significant defense mechanisms, such as the tear film and the cornea, which present challenges for medication to enter. Specifically, the vitreous fluid is difficult for injected medication to traverse to reach the posterior of the eye.
A number of conditions of varying seriousness and interest are:
- Diabetic retinopathy
- Age-related macular degeneration
- Dry eye syndrome
- Retinal detachment
- Advanced age and lifestyle diseases; still an extremely high level of unmet need
- Others of lesser importance can be treated/managed with eyeglasses, OTC medication, antibiotics, and specific hygiene protocols and, in limited instances, with surgery.
Treatment often requires contributions from two or more parts of an inseparable therapeutic triad:
- Ophthalmic pharmacology
- Surgery of the visual tract
- Implantable ophthalmic medical devices
Highly innovative specialist companies dominate pharmacological development. Innovative companies on the drug delivery side are equally important. Industry development occurs through a large number of highly- focused, research-driven specialist companies, often very small and funded through innovation-support funding programs. Such companies can need to be able to easily find a large marketing partner as big pharma is often funding this development externally in lieu of doing it themselves in-house.
Highly innovative specialty companies define and epitomize the requirement for treatments for these conditions that comprise micro-sized and ultra-precision components and assemblies. Anyone who has ever worn corrective contacts and/or been on the bad end of a windy day near an outdoor fire pit, has probably noticed that the smallest speck in your eye can cause you severe pain.
The reasons for micro-sized intraocular implants are to provide the eye with an extreme level of comfort and the least invasive, yet compliant, implants in the human body. The thin and delicate structures of the eye require paper-thin and flexible components that are nonetheless strong enough to withstand extreme fluid pressures in and behind the eye. The successful creation of a device that is both paper-thin and strong is an engineering challenge that requires the skill and expertise that only micro molding and nano surface specialty companies can understand and implement. Let us explore this micro requirement specifically for some of the more common conditions/treatments.
For example, glaucoma, the “sneak thief of sight”, affects many elderly, African Americans, and those with a family history. Considered the second leading cause of blindness (after cataracts), glaucoma is principally caused by elevated intraocular pressure within the eye. Microsurgical devices and intraocular implants are used if eye drops are not an effective treatment. Micro components and surgical treatments include:
- Trabeculectomy (laser surgery) is the most common approach; creates a hole in the sclera to allow fluid to drain into the outer cyst
- Conventional surgery can also be used to create a drainage hole in the white part of the eye if laser surgery is unsuccessful
- Implant surgery positions a device to aid the drainage; estimated that several thousand are performed each year in the US
- Canaloplasty places a microcatheter into the Canal of Schlemm to enlarge the natural drainage channel for healthy eyes.
Figure 1 shows a glaucoma drain, commonly known as a shunt. This shunt is injection molded, spherically shaped with a wedge-shaped radial side action in the tool that creates the drain geometry. At the end of the side action travel is a 250 μm orifice whereby no molding flash can be tolerated. Shunts are mostly tubular, however, this one is shaped and designed for placement in the sclera (side of the eye). It is designed to act like a venturi system that uses the pressure of the eye to push the discharge from glaucoma to behind the eye where it can drain. In addition to the 250 μm entry orifice, there are 4 suture holes of 250 μm diameter (2x a human hair) moulded into the top of the implant. These suture holes also must be free and clear of particulate or flash to prevent sutures from cutting during implantation or after surgery.
Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of permanent impairment of reading ability and loss of fine detail for those over age 65 years. The macula is the central portion of the retina used for seeing fine detail and can be destroyed in one of two ways beginning at age 60.
In 2004, 1.5% of adults over age 40 experienced advanced AMD, and 6.1% had intermediate AMD (1.8 and 7.3 million adults, respectively). The dry form is the most common form of AMD but it can become a wet form that is more destructive. In dry AMD light-sensitive cells in macula break down. Dry AMD is treated by oral ingestion of a high dose of antioxidants and zinc.
Wet AMD is characterized by the growth of abnormal blood vessels behind the retina. Laser surgery is used in a small proportion of patients to destroy these vessels but the treatment also damages the retina. Another treatment approach involved the intravenous injection of a photo-activated drug (into the arm). When exposed to light in the eye the drug is activated and it destroys the unwanted new blood vessels. Injections into the eye to block the growth of abnormal new blood vessels are also available.
Prior to 2007, medicine was not available to treat AMD; in 2007 the market was estimated to represent more than $1.2 billion in sales.
Figure 2 shows an AMD guidance device used in laser surgery. The spherical radius sits on the cornea and the lens underside must be free of flash, mold parting lines, and surface imperfections. The 300 μm laser hole shuts off on the spherical radius and blending these geometries three-dimensionally in steel to produce the polymer micro injection molded component is very challenging.
In this case, material selection was also a key factor in providing the rigidity required to hold the guide in place during laser deployment. USP Class VI materials (they have previously been used in medical products) are necessary and also require OEM testing even if they are shown to be Class VI compliant.
Dry eye is one of the most common reasons for an appointment with an ophthalmologist. Dry eye condition is defined as an irritation of the eye due to an inability to produce or maintain/ retain enough tears on the surface of the eye. It can result in damage to the front surface of the eye and impair vision. The causes vary from specific diseases (such as Sjögren’s syndrome or lacrimal and meibomian gland dysfunction) to other causes including age, gender (women are more susceptible), medications, certain medical conditions, environmental conditions such as exposure to smoke, wind, or dry climates, and other factors such as prolonged use of contact lenses or refractive eye surgeries (LASIK).
Treatment may require micro-components (approximately a quarter of the size of a grain of rice) including punctal plugs (see Figure 3) whereby a plug is surgically placed in both the top and lower eyelid to prevent fluid in the eye from draining, thereby keeping the eye hydrated.
Additional treatments use OTC eye drops or prescription lubricants and anti-inflammatories. These medications are extremely costly and if not administered properly (balancing the dropper over the eye and making sure it all gets into the eye) defeats the purpose and wastes consumer and healthcare costs. Much effort is put into micro pumping and micro administering of these fluids with aspirators, implantable pumps, and slow-release polymers that release the drug in timed increments.
Ophthalmic Device Design Considerations
Many drug delivery devices are now manufactured in non-traditional ways such as silicon wafer technology, MEMS, and ground-up manufacturing methods. These methods are then matched to more traditional top-down methods to provide medical and pharmaceutical companies with differentiated and strategic value. These processing techniques are typically developed using “conventional” single micron level positional accuracy using current work holding devices. These methods are inadequate in preventing cross-contamination of actives in capillaries and other microscopic microfluidic assemblies.
“New methods combine traditional top-down methods with futuristic bottom-up methods to provide medical and pharmaceutical device companies with enabling products to treat the likes of glaucoma, macular degeneration, cataracts, dry eye, and even diabetes around the world…”
Nanometre-positional accuracy was not available to the mainstream even 2-3 years ago. Even today, traditional pallet-holders coupled with automatic X, Y, Z probing can barely guarantee a one-micron positional accuracy. It is also strange to think this isn’t good enough for the eye, but the surface finish is absolutely necessary, orders of magnitude tighter tolerances than seen in conventional or macro manufacturing.
So it is evident that developing ophthalmic and intraocular implants requires thinking at the scale on which the human body operates, and the human body operates at the scale of nanometres. White and Red blood cells on average range from 8-100 μm in diameter and DNA can be as small as 2-3 nm. In between these two range a great deal of discovery and science that we cannot begin to understand without simulation outside the body, for example mimicking strands of DNA and blood cells working together. It is for this reason that ophthalmic, intraocular, drug delivery, and pharmaceutical device companies are looking for help from manufacturers to push the boundaries of what is possible to achieve features and tolerances in the nanometre range.
As shown in Table 1, what we have discovered in the micron range has certainly helped us to learn some top-down methods that didn’t work, and some bottom-up methods that worked but needed some refinement using a combined top-down/ bottom-up method.
|“Top Down” Methods||“Bottom Up” Methods|
|Laser machining||Genetic code|
|Ion machining||Biological cell|
|CNC machining||DNA and RNA|
|Photochemical milling||3D printing|
Table 1: Summary of micro and nanomanufacturing methods used today and in the future.
Growing structures (i.e. bottom-up methods) to create geometry was also not mainstream until 2-3 years ago. A good rule of thumb is that material and process marrying will force a top-down methodology until we can mill, grind, EDM (electrical discharge machine), diamond turn, and etch no more. We have already used LIGA (German acronym meaning lithography, electroplating, and moulding) for many years as a bottom-up method. However, with the emergence of 3D printing, at some point in the near future, we will be looking that technology to create geometry, surfaces, and – when the materials are available and 3D printable – even human organs. This will push micro manufacturers and macro manufacturers beyond our current capabilities in top-down methods, or there might be a “marriage made in heaven” employing both methods.
For example, in the area of diabetes, Google is developing a smart contact lens for measuring glucose in tears (see Figure 4). Google said the lens comprises “chips and sensors so small they look like bits of glitter, and an antenna thinner than a human hair”. The chip and sensor are embedded between two layers of soft contact lens material. A tiny pinhole in the lens allows tear fluid from the surface of the eye to seep into the glucose sensor. The prototypes currently being tested can take glucose level readings every second. The project was co-founded by Brian Otis and Babak Parviz who worked together at the University of Washington (Seattle, WA, US) before moving to Google.
One can’t help imagining that, beyond diagnostics, completely encased electronics placed onto the cornea may one day bring vision, gaming, web browsing, and social interaction to a completely new level.
Alternative methods are coupling neuroscience with ophthalmic science as seen in Figure 5, which shows a retinal implant embedded in the eye that restores vision to the vision-impaired or the visionless.
Non-traditional methods for manufacturing such as nanometre positional accuracy and dust-specked sized injection molded, machined, and assembled components are spawning technological advances in ophthalmic intraocular implants and intraocular drug delivery devices. These new methods combine traditional top-down methods with futuristic bottom-up methods to provide medical and pharmaceutical device companies with enabling products to treat the likes of glaucoma, macular degeneration, cataracts, dry eye, and even diabetes around the world.
Areas unknown can be explored with micro-manufacturing – restoring lost vision, enhancing vision, hydrating eyes in harsh conditions, gaining less invasive, viable ways to cross the elusive blood-retinal barrier, micro-electronics, and eyes controlling the brain to control prosthetics, and even controlling motion for paraplegics. Imagine a technology allowing people to see…… people they haven’t seen in years, objects in a room, light in a sky, food on a plate, and to recognize a smile. We are fortunate to be well-positioned in micro and nanomanufacturing to play a part in enabling these treatments and products that contribute to worldwide health.